{"id":248265,"date":"2024-04-03T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-04-03T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.republicofgreen.com\/a-triumph-and-disgrace-the-very-slow-road-to-banning-asbestos\/"},"modified":"2024-04-03T12:51:07","modified_gmt":"2024-04-03T12:51:07","slug":"a-triumph-and-disgrace-the-very-slow-road-to-banning-asbestos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.republicofgreen.com\/a-triumph-and-disgrace-the-very-slow-road-to-banning-asbestos\/","title":{"rendered":"A Triumph and Disgrace: The Very Slow Road to Banning Asbestos"},"content":{"rendered":"
Like almost all things chemical in the United States, the recent announcement by the Biden administration that it is banning a major form of asbestos is both a triumph and a disgrace.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The triumph is that after decades of Sisyphean advocacy by public health groups and scientists, chrysotile asbestos, a known carcinogen, is finally facing an assorted set of deadlines for import and use in this nation. In a bit of rhetorical ecstasy, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan proclaimed that the federal government \u201cis finally slamming the door on a chemical so dangerous that it has been banned in over 50 countries.\u201d<\/p>\n
While this administration does deserve credit for acting on asbestos after years of neglect, it is more accurate to describe the White House as politely showing the door to companies who use what is nicknamed \u201cwhite asbestos.\u201d Two…<\/p>\n<\/div>\n